Aneeta and Another v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The habeas corpus writ petition was dismissed as infructuous after the corpus was handed over to her mother, who is the natural guardian.
The habeas corpus writ petition was dismissed as infructuous after the corpus was handed over to her mother, who is the natural guardian.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 50
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 873 of 2022
Petitioner :- Aneeta And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Narendra Kumar,Mahabir Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri M.B. Yadav, states that corpus has been handed over to the custody of her mother, petitioner no. 1, who is natural guardian of the corpus, thus, this habeas corpus writ petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed.
Learned AGA has made no objection.
The instant habeas corpus writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 16.1.2023 Dhirendra/
Digitally signed by :- DHIRENDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Aneeta And Another
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court