The habeas corpus petition, not pressed by the petitioner, was dismissed. The order was passed in the presence of counsel for respondent no. 4.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:163094
Court No. - 79
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 665 of 2023
Petitioner :- Sandhya Yadav And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Shiromani Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Brijesh Kumar Yadav,Sandeep Kumar
Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
Sri Atul Kumar Vishwas, Advocate holding brief of Sri Ram Shiromani Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner does not want to press this petition and it may be dismissed as not pressed.
In view of statement of learned counsel for the petitioner, the habeas corpus petition is dismissed as not pressed.
This order has been passed in the presence of Sri Brijesh Kumar Yadav, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.4.
Order Date :- 11.8.2023 Virendra
Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR BHARTEEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Sandhya Yadav
Other
State Of U.P.
Other
Other
Vipin Chandra Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
