The High Court dismissed Criminal Revision No. 597 of 2023 filed by Surendra Sharma because the counsel for the revisionist explicitly stated that the revision was not being pressed.
Criminal Revision dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:163067
Court No. - 79
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 597 of 2023 Revisionist :- Surendra Sharma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- G.S. Chauhan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Avnish Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
Sri Deepak Singh, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri G.S. Chauhan, learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the revisionist does not want to press this criminal revision and it may be dismissed as not pressed.
In view of above statement made by learned counsel for the revisionist, the present criminal revision is dismissed as not pressed.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
This order has been passed in the presence of Mohd. Afzal, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Avnish Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party nos. 2 to 4.
Order Date :- 11.8.2023 sailesh
Digitally signed by :- SAILESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Surendra Sharma
State Of U.P.
Vipin Chandra Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
