In a writ petition seeking production of the petitioner (corpus), the High Court heard the petitioner who stated she voluntarily resides with and is married to respondent no.6. Finding no cause of action survives, the petition was disposed of.
The writ petition was finally disposed of as no cause of action survived.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 79 Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 452 of 2023
Petitioner :- Priya Nishad And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Juned Alam,Pradeep Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Donadi Ramesh,J.
" (i) issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 and 3 to produce the corpus namely Priya Nishad before this Hon'ble Court of an early date and set his liberty forthwith and further may be pleased to taken appropriate action against the respondents.
(ii) issue any other habeas corpus writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case."
(Donadi Ramesh, J.)
Order Date :- 18.8.2023/VS
Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR BARATAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the corpus surrendered voluntarily ending the cause of action for the writ petition.
Priya Nishad And Another
State Of U.P.
Donadi Ramesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
