We have been taken through the judgment of acquittal passed by the Court below, learned AGA and in order to contend that the facts have not been appreciated in right perspective, however, we find that the adverse inference drawn on the prosecution case on account of contradictory stand taken by the victim at different stages of proceedings is clearly shown from the records. In view of the admitted case that no external or internal injury was found on the victim, the view taken by the Court below to grant benefit of doubt to the accused is clearly permissible view and just because a different view could be taken would ordinarily not be a ground for this Court to interfere with the order of acquittal. In such circumstances, we find that neither any triable issue is raised before us in this appeal nor any perversity is shown, which may persuade this Court to grant leave to assail the judgment of acquittal. Prayer made by the State for grant of leave is, accordingly, refused and the appeal, consequently, fails and is dismissed .
