A defective appeal from 2004 was dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant failed to cure a defect and did not appear to press the matter even after multiple adjournments.
Interim relief, if any, stands vacated forthwith.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 44
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 960 of 2004
Appellant :- Ram Autar Bansal Respondent :- Rakesh Bajpayee And Others Counsel for Appellant :- B.D. Shukla
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
This is a defective appeal of the year 2004. The only defect is non filing of certificate of deposit which has not yet been cure.
Even in the fourth round, none has appeared to press this appeal.
This Court has no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.
Dismissed.
Interim relief, if any, stands vacated forthwith.
Order Date :- 23.1.2023 DKS
Digitally signed by :- DEEPAK KUMAR SRIVASTWA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Autar Bansal
Rakesh Bajpayee and Others
Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
