This order notes the year of an appeal under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. The single judge dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution as the appellant was not present.
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 44
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 505 of 1999
Appellant :- Shailendra Bahadur Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Appellant :- B.N.Singh
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
None present for the appellant.
This appeal is of the year 1999 under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.
I have no other option but to dismiss the appeal.
Hence, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 12.1.2023 PS
Digitally signed by :- POOJA SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shailendra Bahadur
State of U.P.
Another
Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
