This is a recallable revision appeal dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant failed to appoint an advocate after the senior advocate's designation.
Appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 44
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 738 of 1989
Appellant :- U.P.S.R.T.C. Respondent :- Smt. Ratna Das Gupta Counsel for Appellant :- ,R.R.Yadav,Sameer Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- V.N.Agrawal, ,Arjun Singhal,Ashok Nath Tripathi,Parmatma Rai
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
This is an appeal of the year 1989.
Called in revise. None has appeared.
It appears that after designation of Sri Sameer Sharma as Senior Advocate, the U.P.S.R.T.C. has not appointed any advocate to conduct the matter.
This Court has no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.
Dismissed.
Interim relief, if any, stands vacated forthwith.
Amount deposited be paid to the claimants forthwith after encashing the fixed deposit which has accrued to their benefit.
Order Date :- 24.1.2023 DKS
Digitally signed by :- DEEPAK KUMAR SRIVASTWA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
U.P.S.R.T.C.
Smt. Ratna Das Gupta
Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
