Disposed¶14

Regional Manager U.P.S.R.T.C. and Another v. Smt. Ram Dulari

Allahabad HC11 Feb 2023FAFO/2075/2004

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Lok Adalat; National Lok Adalat; Allahabad High Court; First Appeal From Order 2075 of 2004; withdrawal of appeal; Regional Manager U.P.S.R.T.C.; insurance company; Smt. Ram Dulari; Tribunal award; statutory deposit remittance to Tribunal; disbursement; cross appeal/cross objection; compromise; Shekhar Kumar Yadav J.; Chhotey Lal Chaudhary conciliator; order dated 11.02.2023; claimant absent.

What did the court decide?

Appeal withdrawn and disposed of; statutory deposit to be remitted forthwith to the Tribunal for disbursement; parties to act as per compromise; any pending cross appeal/cross objection of the claimant to be listed for disposal in accordance with law. ¶14

Regional Manager U.P.S.R.T.C. and Another Vs Smt. Ram Dulari — Allahabad HC (2023) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶14

Issue for consideration

Whether the First Appeal From Order should be withdrawn and disposed of, the appellant having stated that nothing remained to argue in the light of judgments of the Apex Court and High Courts.

¶8

Court's answer

The appeal stands withdrawn, bringing to an end the lis between the parties.

¶10

Ratio / Principle

The statutory amount deposited at the time of filing of the appeal, if not already remitted, is to be remitted forthwith to the Tribunal, which shall make the disbursement if not yet made.

¶11

Key takeaways

If any Cross Appeal/Cross Objection filed by the Claimant(s) is pending, it may be listed before the Court for disposal in accordance with law.obiter¶12
Parties to act as per compromise.ratio¶13

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Lok Adalat disposal (National Lok Adalat, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Court No. 46, 11.02.2023): First Appeal From Order No. 2075 of 2004, filed on behalf of the appellant insurance company (Regional Manager, U.P.S.R.T.C.) against the award passed by the Tribunal in favour of claimant Smt. Ram Dulari, was withdrawn on an application duly signed by the Authorised Signatory of the appellant insurance company and its learned advocate, stating that nothing remained to argue in the light of various judgments of the Apex Court and High Courts. None appeared for the claimant. The appeal stands withdrawn and is disposed of; the statutory amount deposited at the time of filing is to be remitted forthwith to the Tribunal, where disbursement shall be made if not already made; parties to act as per compromise; any pending cross appeal/cross objection of the claimant to be listed before the Court for disposal in accordance with law. Bench: Shekhar Kumar Yadav, J. and Chhotey Lal Chaudhary, Advocate (Conciliators).

Regional Manager U.P.S.R.T.C. and Another v. Smt. Ram Dulari

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Regional Manager U.P.S.R.T.C. and Another v. Smt. Ram Dulari

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prashant Rai and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Fahim Ahmad @ Fahim Khan and 7 Others Vs State of U.P and 2 Others

Ram Sewak and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

U.P.S.R.T.C. Thru Its Regional Manager and Others Vs Shanti and Others

U.P.S.R.T.C. Vs Smt. Sarojini Devi and Others

U.P. State Road Transport Corporation Vs Smt. Shakila and Othes