A criminal revision application was declared instituted late; the delay application was dismissed for want of prosecution. Consequently, the revision was dismissed as no revision existed.
CRl. Misc. Delay Condonation Application No. 59086 of 1999 dismissed under Section 5 of Limitation Act; Revision No. 169 of 1997 dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:154992
Court No. - 81
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 169 of 1997
Revisionist :- Smt.Jagannathiya Opposite Party :- Ram Autar Counsel for Revisionist :- Amna Mumtaz,Z.K.Hasan Counsel for Opposite Party :- R.K.S.Chauhan,A.G.A.
Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma, J.
Case called out in the revised list.
None responds to press this revision on behalf of the revisionist. Crl. Misc. Delay Condonation Application No. 59086 of 1999, moved under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Since no revision is existing. Hence, the revision is dismissed and consigned to record room .
Order Date :- 2.8.2023 Vinod.
Digitally signed by :- VINOD KUMAR JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Jagannathiya
Ram Autar
Umesh Chandra Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
