In a criminal revision against conviction under IPC sections 279, 427, and 304-A, the High Court dismissed the revisionist's application for condonation of delay totaling 3754 days due to want of prosecution, leading to the dismissal of the revision itself.
The application for condonation of delay was dismissed; the criminal revision petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 119 of 2011
Revisionist :- Balkishan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- Shiv Avtar Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
In Re: Criminal Misc. Delay Condonation Application No. 71603 of 2011.
Even in the revised call none has appeared for the revisionist, however, learned A.G.A for the State is present.
The present delay condonation application has been filed to condone the delay of 3754 days in filing of the criminal revision which is against the conviction under section 279, 427 and 304-A of I.P.C
The delay condonation appliction is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order on revision.
Accordingly the criminal revision is also dismissed.
Order Date :- 7.4.2023 Saurabh
Digitally signed by :- ISHAN JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 3754 days in filing criminal revision petition should be condoned for want of prosecution?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Balkishan
State of U.P.
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
