The Allahabad High Court dismissed the criminal revision petition as not pressed on the submission that the revisionist did not wish to pursue it.
Criminal revision dismissed as not pressed; interim order stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:216683
Court No. - 79
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 5828 of 2023
Revisionist :- Nem Kumar @ Seepu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Anurag Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
Ms. Prachi Shukla, Advocate holding brief of Sri Anurag Dubey, learned counsel for the revisionist states that the revisionist does not want to press the revision and it may be dismissed as not pressed.
In view of above submission, the instant criminal revision is dismissed as not pressed.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 9.11.2023
P.P.
Digitally signed by :- POONAM PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Vipin Chandra Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
