The criminal revision was dismissed as it was not pressed by the counsel for the revisionist. The court directed the office to return the certified copy of the impugned judgment to the counsel after retaining a photocopy on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 79
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 5351 of 2023
Revisionist :- Pankaj Sharma @ Trilok Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Devesh Kumar Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
Sri Devesh Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the revisionist states that revisionist does not want to press this criminal revision and it may be dismissed as not pressed.
In view of the statement of learned counsel for the revisionist, the present criminal revision is dismissed as not pressed.
Office is directed to return the certified copy of impugned judgment and order dated 28.8.2023 to learned counsel for the revisionist after detaining the photo copy of the same on record.
Order Date :- 9.11.2023 Kpy
Digitally signed by :- KAVLESHWAR PRASAD YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Vipin Chandra Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
