This is an identical judgment regarding a criminal revision under Section 125 Cr.P.C. The High Court rejected the contention that the awarded maintenance of Rs. 5000 per month was unreasonable, dismissing the revision as devoid of merit.
The revision petition is dismissed as it is devoid of merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:227933
Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 5552 of 2023
Revisionist :- Prikshit Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Mayank Yadav,Vivek Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
Order Date :- 1.12.2023 Anil K. Sharma
[Vinod Diwakar, J.]
Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revision petition maintaining that the awarded monthly maintenance is unreasonable warrants setting aside the Family Court order.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
State of U.P.
Vinod Diwakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
