The Allahabad High Court dismissed a criminal revision petition challenging an order awarding monthly maintenance to the wife respondent no. 2 under Section 125 Cr.P.C., finding no grounds for interference despite noting the five-year disposal delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:227909
Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 5373 of 2023
Revisionist :- Kanno Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Prem Babu Verma,Anita Singh,Kumari Poonam Rajpoot,Nirmla Kumari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
Order Date :- 1.12.2023 Anil K. Sharma
[Vinod Diwakar, J.]
Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the revision petition against the maintenance order deserves to be allowed.
Whether sufficient grounds exist to quash the family court order awarding maintenance.
Whether the delay in disposing of the maintenance application warrants drawing adverse inferences in revision.
Kanno Singh
State Of U.P.
Vinod Diwakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
