Allowed

Juvenile -X v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC10 Aug 2023CRLR/5424/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Criminal Revision allowed by the Allahabad High Court. The court set aside orders of the Juvenile Justice Board and appellate court for failure to apply judicial mind and consider the Juvenile Justice Act. Bail was granted with strict supervision conditions.

What did the court decide?

Orders of Juvenile Justice Board dated 05.11.2022 and appellate court dated 29.11.2022 set aside; revision allowed; delinquent released on bail with conditions.

Juvenile -X Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:161582

¶2

Court No. - 80

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 5424 of 2022

¶4

Revisionist :- Juvenile -X Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Devendra Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the revisionist as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶7

The present criminal revision has been preferred by the revisionist through his father with a prayer to allow this revision and set aside the judgment and order dated 29.11.2022 passed by learned Additional District & Sessions Judge/ Special Judge (POCSO Act), Mau in Criminal Appeal No. 114 of 2022 as well as order dated 05.11.2022 passed by Juvenile Justice Board, Mau. Further prayed to release the revisionist on bail in Case Crime No. 451 of 2022 under Section 363, 366, 376 I.P.C. & 3/4 POCSO Act, Police Station Ghosi, District Mau.

¶8

It is submitted by learned counsel for the revisionist that in this case the delinquent was aged about 16 years at the time of alleged incident. It is further submitted that the victim was aged about 13 years and was in affair with the delinquent, so she went with him and physical relations were established between both of them. She also expressed in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. before the learned Magistrate as aforesaid and also expressed her willingness to marry with the delinquent. This shows that both were volunteer and no any force or violence was used against the victim by the present delinquent. During medical examination the victim and her mother denied from medical. It is further submitted that there is nothing adverse against the interest of the delinquent in the report submitted by D.P.O.

¶9

It is further submitted that the provisions as contained u/s 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act had not been considered by the Juvenile Justice Board even the report submitted by Probation Officer was also not considered. The appellate court has also not considered all these facts but rejected the appeal without applying its judicial mind and considering the law as contained u/s 12 of the aforesaid Act. He is in Child Care Home since 14.09.2022 i.e. and his psychology is being affected adversely, therefore, requested to set aside orders passed by the J.J. Board as well as appellate court and allow the criminal revision.

¶10

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer as aforesaid.

¶11

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submission made by learned counsel for the revisionist as well as learned A.G.A. for the State, the provisions as contained u/s 12 of Juvenile Justice Act, the report submitted by the Probation Officer, it appears that Juvenile Justice Board as well as the appellate court had not considered the relevant provisions and the material on record in well manner but passed the orders without applying their judicial mind. In this way, there appears ground in this revision and the orders passed by the Juvenile Justice Board as well as learned appellate court are liable to be set aside.

¶12

Accordingly, the orders passed by Juvenile Justice Board dated 05.11.2022 and the appellate court dated 29.11.2022 are, hereby, set aside and present criminal revision is hereby, allowed .

¶13

It is directed that delinquent/applicant be released on bail on executing person bond by the revisionist ( father of the delinquent) and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Juvenile Justice Board concerned on following conditions :-

¶14

(i) The revisionist/ father will furnish an undertaking that upon release on bail the revisionist will not be permitted to go into contact or association with any known criminal or allowed to be exposed to any moral, physical, or psychological danger and further that the father will ensure that the juvenile will not repeat the offence.

¶15

(ii) The revisionist/ father will further furnish an undertaking to the effect that the juvenile will pursue his study at the appropriate level which he would be encouraged to do besides other constructive activities and not be allowed to waste his time in unproductive and excessive recreational pursuits.

¶16

(iii) Juvenile and the revisionist/ father will report to the Probation Officer on the first Monday of every calendar month.

¶17

(iv) The Probation Officer will keep a strict vigil on the activities of the juvenile and regularly draw up his social investigation report that would be submitted to the Juvenile Justice Board concerned on such a periodical basis as the Juvenile Justice Board may determine.

¶18

Order Date :- 10.8.2023 Suraj Srivastav

¶19

Digitally signed by :- SURAJ SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Juvenile -X v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Juvenile -X v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Junenile -X Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

X- Minor Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Bindpal Singh and Another Vs State of U P and 8 Others

X (Juvenile) Vs State of U.P. and Another

X- Juvenile Vs State of U.P. and Another

Juvenile -X Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others