Allowed

Junenile -X v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC9 Aug 2023CRLR/5060/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court allowed a criminal revision filed by a juvenile delinquent on behalf of to set aside orders of the Juvenile Justice Board and appellate court for failing to consider Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act and the Probation Officer's report. The revisionist was released on bail.

What did the court decide?

The orders of the Juvenile Justice Board dated 26.09.2022 and the appellate court dated 01.11.2022 are set aside. The delinquent is ordered to be released on bail.

Junenile -X Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Child Custody and Guardianship | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:160578

¶2

Court No. - 80

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 5060 of 2022

¶4

Revisionist :- Junenile -X Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- R.K. Shahi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Chandra Prakash Misra,A/N0089/2012

¶5

Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.

¶6

Counter affidavit has filed by learned A.G.A. today in Court which is taken on record.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the revisionist as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶8

The present criminal revision has been preferred by the revisionist through his mother with a prayer to allow this revision and set aside the judgment and order dated 01.11.2022 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge/ Special Judge (POCSO Act), Court No.1, Deoria in Criminal Appeal No. 69 of 2022 as well as order dated 26.09.2022 passed by Juvenile Justice Board, Deoria. Further prayed to release the revisionist on bail in Case Crime No. 117 of 2022 under Sections 376-D I.P.C. & 3/4 POCSO Act, Police Station- Lar, District- Deoria.

¶9

It is submitted by learned counsel for the revisionist that in this case, the delinquent was aged about 15 years at the time of alleged incident and is in child care home since 02.06.2022 i.e. more than one year. It is further submitted that F.I.R. was lodged after delay of 50 days without any explanation. It is also submitted that the age of the victim was about 19 years as per medical opinion and she was in affair with co-accused Ashif Ali, who was major and went with him to Gujarat where present delinquent was living in a rented room. There was dispute between Ashif Ali and victim that was a reason present F.I.R. was lodged including the present delinquent also. The victim made statement about commission of rape by the present delinquent also, but there is nothing on record to show that rape was committed by him in presence of Ashif Ali, who was in relation to the victim. It is further submitted that there is nothing adverse against the interest of the delinquent in the report submitted by D.P.O.

¶10

It is further submitted that the provisions as contained u/s 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act had not been considered by the Juvenile Justice Board even the report submitted by Probation Officer was also not considered. The appellate court has also not considered all these facts but rejected the appeal without applying its judicial mind and considering the law as contained u/s 12 of the aforesaid Act. He is in Child Care Home since 02.06.2022 i.e. more than one year and his psychology is being affected adversely, therefore, requested to set aside orders passed by the J.J. Board as well as appellate court and allow the criminal revision.

¶11

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer as aforesaid.

¶12

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submission made by learned counsel for the revisionist as well as learned A.G.A. for the State, the time delinquent remained in Child Care Home i.e. 02.06.2022, perusal of record, the provisions as contained u/s 12 of Juvenile Justice Act, the report submitted by the Probation Officer, it appears that Juvenile Justice Board as well as the appellate court had not considered the relevant provisions and the material on record in well manner but passed the orders without applying their judicial mind. In this way, there appears ground in this revision and the orders passed by the Juvenile Justice Board as well as learned appellate court are liable to be set aside.

¶13

Accordingly, the orders passed by Juvenile Justice Board dated 26.09.2022 and the appellate court dated 01.11.2022 are, hereby, set aside and present criminal revision is hereby, allowed.

¶14

It is directed that delinquent/applicant be released on bail on executing person bond by the revisionist (mother of the delinquent) and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Juvenile Justice Board concerned on following conditions :-

¶15

(i) The revisionist/ mother will furnish an undertaking that upon release on bail the revisionist will not be permitted to go into contact or association with any known criminal or allowed to be exposed to any moral, physical, or psychological danger and further that the mother will ensure that the juvenile will not repeat the offence.

¶16

(ii) The revisionist/ mother will further furnish an undertaking to the effect that the juvenile will pursue his study at the appropriate level which he would be encouraged to do besides other

¶17

constructive activities and not be allowed to waste his time in unproductive and excessive recreational pursuits.

¶18

(iii) Juvenile and the revisionist/ mother will report to the Probation Officer on the first Monday of every calendar month.

¶19

(iv) The Probation Officer will keep a strict vigil on the activities of the juvenile and regularly draw up his social investigation report that would be submitted to the Juvenile Justice Board concerned on such a periodical basis as the Juvenile Justice Board may determine.

¶20

Order Date :- 9.8.2023 M.S. Ansari

¶21

Digitally signed by :- MOHD SAQIB ANSARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Junenile -X v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Junenile -X v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Juvenile Vs State of U.P. and Another

Juvenile X Vs State of U.P. and Another

X Juvenile Vs State of U.P. and Another

X- Minor Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Bindpal Singh and Another Vs State of U P and 8 Others

Diwakar Mishra Vs State of U.P. and 10 Others