In this criminal revision, counsel for the revisionist stated that the dispute between parties was amicably settled and the revision was not pressed. Consequently, this court dismissed the revision as not pressed and vacated any interim order.
Criminal revision dismissed as not pressed; interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:143789
Court No. - 79
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 5225 of 2022
Revisionist :- Amit Kumar Dwivedi @ Viru Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Arun Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
Sri Arun Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the revisionist states that parties had amicably settled their dispute outside the Court and the revisionist does not want to press this revision.
In view of the statement of learned counsel for the revisionist, the present criminal revision is dismissed as not pressed.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 19.7.2023 Kpy
Digitally signed by :- KAVLESHWAR PRASAD YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Amit Kumar Dwivedi @ Viru
State Of U.P.
Vipin Chandra Dixit
Kavlешwar Prasad Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
