Learned counsel appearing for respondent no.2 has raised a preliminary objection that father of petitioner, namely, Jai Pal Singh had already challenged the order dated 15.4.2006 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Meerut in Case No.225 of 2004, under Section 630 of the Company Act, 1956 and the appeal preferred by father of petitioner against the order dated 15.4.2006 was also dismissed by Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.16, Meerut vide order dated 28.4.2011 in Criminal Appeal No.134 of 2006. The present petition on behalf of petitioner against the same impugned orders is not maintainable. It is further pointed out that father of petitioner had also challenged both the orders by filing Criminal Revision No.2400 of 2011 (Jai Pal Singh Vs. State of U.P. and others) which was dismissed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide judgment and order dated 5.12.2014. The father of petitioner has not challenged the judgment and order dated 5.12.2014 passed in Criminal Revision No.2400 of 2011 which attained finality. Lastly, it is submitted that petitioner, who is son of Jai Pal Singh had filed the present petition challenging the order dated 15.4.2006 passed by C.J.M., Meerut as well as the order dated 28.4.2011 passed by lower appellate court, as such present petition is not maintainable.
