The criminal revision was dismissed because the counsel for the revisionist stated that the revision is not being pressed and may be dismissed accordingly. No legal proposition was laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:236407
Court No. - 79
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 4161 of 2022
Revisionist :- Vineet Shukla Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Sharad Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
Shri Sharad Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the revisionist states that the revisionist does not want to press this revision and it may be dismissed as not pressed.
In view of the statement of the learned counsel for the revisionist, the criminal revision is dismissed as not pressed.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 13.12.2023 SFH
Digitally signed by :- SYED FAHIM HUSAIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Vipin Chandra Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
