The revision was dismissed as infructuous because the revisionist had confessed in the case and filed an affidavit dated 11.4.2022.
Revision dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 403 of 2021
Revisionist :- Jagdeesh Prasad Nishad (Minor) Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Atul Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Vijay Babu
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
None appears for the revisionist as well as opposite party No. 2 even in the revised call, however, Shri Abhishek Singh, learned brief holder for the State is present.
Learned brief holder for the State submits that the present revision has become infructuous as the case has been confessed by the revisionist and in this regard, the revisionist has filed an affidavit dated 11.4.2022.
In view of the above, present revision is dismissed as infructuous. Order Date :- 11.4.2023 T. Sinha
Digitally signed by :- TRIPTI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
State of U.P.
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
Tripti Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
