This single-judge criminal revision held that the petition was infructuous following the revisionist's conviction by the trial court.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1738 of 2022
Revisionist :- Juvenile ' Y '(Minor) Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Vivek Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Sri Narendra Kumar Yadav, Advocate holding brief of Sri Vivek Singh, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri Ashutosh Srivastava, brief holder for the State are present. Despite service of notice upon opposite party no. 2, no one has appeared.
Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the present criminal revision has become infructuous after conviction of the revisionist by the trial court.
In view of the above, the present criminal revision is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 10.4.2023 Ishan
Digitally signed by :- ISHAN JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Juvenile 'Y' (Minor)
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
