The Court dismissed a criminal revision petition challenging an order that treated a Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. application as a complaint case. The Court found no error of jurisdiction, material irregularity, or illegality and held the revision devoid of merits.
The criminal revision (No. 2825 of 2023) was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:117485
Court No. - 83
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2825 of 2023
Revisionist :- Smt. Shobha Devi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Ganesh Mani,Birendra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
[Krishan Pahal, J.]
Order Date :- 25.5.2023 Vikas
Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned order treating Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. application as a complaint case was passed without application of mind or with error of jurisdiction.
Whether the criminal revision has any merit against the impugned order.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Krishan Pahal
Vikas Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
