This criminal revision filed by a juvenile was dismissed as infructuous because the trial court had already acquitted the revisionist, rendering the present proceedings unnecessary.
The revision was dismissed as having become infructuous due to the acquittal of the revisionist by the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2685 of 2022
Revisionist :- X (Juvenile) Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Raj Nath Bhakta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Sri Raj Nath Bhakta, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri Saurabh Srivastava, learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
Despite service of notice upon opposite party no.2 none has appeared.
Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the revisionist has been acquitted by the trial court and due to acquittal of the revisionist the present revision has become infructuous.
Accordingly, this revision is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 22.2.2023 MAA/-
Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD AZAD ANSARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal revision is maintainable after the acquittal of the revisionist.
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
