This order dismisses a criminal revision as infructuous. The revisionist counsel stated that the revision has become infructuous, and the court accepted this submission.
The criminal revision is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:199405
Court No. - 80
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 26 of 2022
Revisionist :- Mr. X Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Jagadish Prasad Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Om Prakash Singh
Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.
Sri Jagadish Prasad Yadav learned counsel for the revisionist states that this criminal revision has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous.
Accordingly, this criminal revision is dismissed as infructuous .
Order Date :- 16.10.2023 Suraj Srivastav
Digitally signed by :- SURAJ SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
State of U.P.
Subhash Chandra Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
