Allowed

X- Juvenile v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC13 Oct 2023CRLR/3658/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court allowed criminal revision filed by a 14-year-old juvenile's mother. The court set aside orders from the Juvenile Justice Board and Child Court as they failed to consider Section 12 of the JJ Act. The juvenile was directed to be released on bail with specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners orders of Juvenile Justice Board dated 19.1.2023 and Child Court dated 20.6.2023 set aside. Delinquent released on bail with conditions.

X- Juvenile Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:197976

¶2

Court No. - 80

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3658 of 2023

¶4

Revisionist :- X- Juvenile Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Bhaju Ram Pprasad Sharma,Arvind Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for revisionist, learned A.G.A. for State and perused the record.

¶7

The present criminal revision has been preferred by the revisionist through his mother under Section 102 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act-2015 (hereinafter referred to as "J.J. Act, 2015) to allow the present revision and set aside the judgment and order dated 20.6.2023 passed by learned Child Court/ Additional Sessions Judge, Maharajganj in Criminal Appeal No. 07 of 2023 as well as order dated 19.1.2023 passed by Juvenile Justice Board, Maharajganj. Further prayed to stay the operation of the aforesaid orders and to release the revisionist on bail in Case Crime No. 299 of 2021, under Sections 363, 376 IPC & Section 3/4 POCSO Act, Police Station Kotwali, District Maharaganj.

¶8

It is submitted by learned counsel for the revisionist that in this case, the delinquent was juvenile aged about 14 years 11 months and 20 days at the time of alleged offence. Further submitted that the vcitim was also 14 years and there was love affair between both of them that was the reason she went with him voluntarily from her house by taking golden ring and Rs. 8000/- in cash from the house, it shows that she was volunteer. Her statement was recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. before the learned Magistrate in which she stated clearly that there was in love affair between both of them and she went with him volunterily and also took cash and golden ring from the house. No force or violence was used by the revisionist with the victim. It is also submitted that there is nothing on record to show the complicity of present delinquent. There is nothing adverse to the present delinquent in the report as submitted by the District Probation Officer. The provisions as contained under Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act had not been considered by the Juvenile Justice Board as well as appellate court while rejecting the appeal which cannot be said to be in conformity with the law. The delinquent is in Juvenile Care Home since 3.7.2021 and his psychology is being affected adversely, therefore, requested to set aside the order passed by the J.J. Board as well as appellate court and allow the criminal revision.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. opposed the aforesaid prayer.

¶10

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the revisionist as well as learned A.G.A., perusal of record, the provisions as contained u/s 12 Juvenile Justice Act and report submitted by the D.P.O. it appears that J.J. Board as well as the appellate court had not considered the relevant provisions and the material on record in well manner but passed the orders without applying their judicial mind. In this way, there appears ground in this revision and the orders passed by the Juvenile Justice Board as well as learned appellate court are liable to be set aside.

¶11

Accordingly, the orders passed by Juvenile Justice Board dated 19.1.2023 and the appellate court dated 20.6.2023 are, hereby, set aside and present Criminal Revision is hereby, allowed .

¶12

It is directed that delinquent/applicant be released on bail on executing personal bond by the revisionist (mother of the delinquent) and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Juvenile Justice Board concerned on following conditions:-

¶13

(i) The revisionist/mother will furnish an undertaking that upon release on bail the revisionist will not be permitted to go into contact or association with any known criminal or allowed to be exposed to any moral, physical, or psychological danger and further that the mother will ensure that the juvenile will not repeat the offence.

¶14

(ii) The revisionist/mother will further furnish an undertaking to the effect that the juvenile will pursue his study at the appropriate level which he would be encouraged to do besides other constructive activities and not be allowed to waste his time in unproductive and excessive recreational pursuits.

¶15

(iii) Juvenile and the revisionist/mother will report to the Probation Officer on the first Monday of every calendar month.

¶16

(iv) The Probation Officer will keep a strict vigil on the activities of the juvenile and regularly draw up his social investigation report that would be submitted to the Juvenile Justice Board, concerned on such a periodical basis as the Juvenile Justice Board may determine.

¶17

Order Date :- 13.10.2023 A. Singh

¶18

Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

X- Juvenile v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

X- Juvenile v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohd. Yakub Nizami Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

X- Minor Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

M/S Maxico Sports Nawab Core Building and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Juvenile -X Vs State of U.P. and Another

Vakil Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Vijay Pal Singh Vs State of U.P. and 6 Others