The revision was dismissed as not pressed. The interim order, if any, was discharged.
Rev. No. 2379 of 2023 dismissed as not pressed; interim order, if any, discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:196022
Court No. - 79
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2379 of 2023
Revisionist :- Ravi Shankar Trivedi And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Sarvesh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Usha Srivastava,Vinod Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
Sri Pramod Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Sri Sarvesh, learned counsel for the revisionists submits that the revisionists do not want to press this revision and it may be dismissed as not pressed.
In view of above submission, the present criminal revision is dismissed as not pressed.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 10.10.2023
P.P.
Digitally signed by :- POONAM PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Vipin Chandra Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
