The brief facts of the case is that the first information report was lodged by revisionist against the seven accused persons including opposite party nos. 2 to 5 with the allegation that the accused persons have tortured the revisionist on account of demand of dowry. The case was registered as Case Crime No. 0025 of 2019, under Section 498A, 323, 504, 377 I.P.c. and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act in Police Station- Mahila Thana, District- Kanpur Nagar. The Investigating Officer after completing investigation has submitted charge sheet against the three named accused persons and opposite party nos. 2 to 5 were exonerated. During trial the revisionist, who is informant has appeared as PW-1 and her examination-in-chief was recorded in which she has levelled allegations against all the accused persons including opposite party nos. 2 to 5. The revisionist had moved an application 319 Cr.P.C. before the trial court with the allegation that the opposite party nos. 2 to 5 were also demanded dowry and tortured the revisionist but the Investigating Officer without conducting fair investigation has exonerated them and charge sheet was submitted only against three accused persons, who are husband, mother-in-law and fatherin-law of the revisionist. The learned trial court vide order dated 13.05.2022 had rejected the application filed by revisionist under Section 319 Cr.P.C. as revisionist was not cross-examined and it was observed that the application under Section 319 Cr.P.C is
