The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissed a criminal revision as infructuous due to the passage of time without engaging in substantive reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:154774
Court No. - 79
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1976 of 2022
Revisionist :- Manoj Kushwaha Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Shyam Sunder Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
Sri Shyam Sunder Maurya, learned counsel for the revisionist states that due to passage of time the present criminal revision has become infructuous.
In view of the statement of learned counsel for the revisionist, the present criminal revision is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 2.8.2023 Kpy
Digitally signed by :- KAVLESHWAR PRASAD YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Vipin Chandra Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
