Juvenile X v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
This criminal revision was dismissed as infructuous by a single-digit judicial order containing no substantive legal propositions.
This criminal revision was dismissed as infructuous by a single-digit judicial order containing no substantive legal propositions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:169727
Court No. - 80
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2543 of 2023
Revisionist :- Juvenile X Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Abhijeet Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.
Sri Gulab Yadav, Advocate holding brief of Sri Abhijeet Singh, learned counsel for the revisionist states that this criminal revision has become infructuous and it may be dismissed as infructuous.
Accordingly, this criminal revision is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 23.8.2023 A. Singh
Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Juvenile X
State of U.P.
Subhash Chandra Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court