Allowed

Juvenile -X v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC6 Dec 2023CRLR/1461/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The revision court set aside orders of the Juvenile Justice Board and appellate court that failed to apply their judicial mind to relevant provisions. The case was allowed, and bail was granted with strict supervision conditions.

What did the court decide?

Set aside the orders of the Juvenile Justice Board dated 21.12.2022 and appellate court dated 08.02.2023. Released the revicionist on bail with strict supervision conditions.

Juvenile -X Vs State of U.P. and Another — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:231307

¶2

Court No. - 80

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1461 of 2023

¶4

Revisionist :- Juvenile -X Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Rahul Saxena Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the revisionist as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶7

The present criminal revision has been preferred by the revisionist through his father with a prayer to allow this revision and set aside the judgment and order dated 08.02.2023 passed by learned Special Judge (POCSO Act)/ Child Court, Pilibhit, in Criminal Appeal No. 2 of 2023 as well as order dated 21.12.2022 passed by Juvenile Justice Board, Pilibhit. Further prayed to release the revisionist on bail in Case Crime No. 558 of 2022 under Section 302 and 201 I.P.C., Police Station Bisalpur, District Pilibhit.

¶8

It is submitted by learned counsel for the revisionist that in this case the delinquent was aged about 15 years at the time of alleged incident. It is further submitted that revisionist was not named in F.I.R. but during the course of investigation his name was brought into light with other co-accused Vijay Gangwar who was major and has already been granted regular bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in criminal misc. bail application no. 11049 of 2023 vide order dated 19.10.2023. No any specific role has been assigned to the present revisionist and the recovery shown against him was at the joint instance of present revisionist and other coaccused person and it was planted by the police. It is further submitted that there is nothing adverse against the interest of the delinquent in the report submitted by D.P.O.

¶9

It is further submitted that the provisions as contained u/s 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act had not been considered by the Juvenile Justice Board even the report submitted by Probation Officer was also not considered. The appellate court has also not considered all these facts but rejected the appeal without applying its judicial mind and considering the law as contained u/s 12 of the aforesaid Act. He is in Child Care Home since 14.09.2022 i.e. more than one year and his psychology is being affected adversely, therefore, requested to set aside orders passed by the J.J. Board as well as appellate court and allow the criminal revision.

¶10

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer as aforesaid.

¶11

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submission made by learned counsel for the revisionist as well as learned A.G.A. for the State, perusal of record, the provisions as contained u/s 12 of Juvenile Justice Act, the report submitted by the Probation Officer, it appears that Juvenile Justice Board as well as the appellate court had not considered the relevant provisions and the material on record in well manner but passed the orders without applying their judicial mind. In this way, there appears ground in this revision and the orders passed by the Juvenile Justice Board as well as learned appellate court are liable to be set aside.

¶12

Accordingly, the orders passed by Juvenile Justice Board dated 21.12.2022 and the appellate court dated 08.02.2023 are, hereby, set aside and present criminal revision is hereby, allowed .

¶13

It is directed that delinquent/applicant be released on bail on executing person bond by the revisionist ( father of the delinquent) and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Juvenile Justice Board concerned on following conditions :-

¶14

(i) The revisionist/ father will furnish an undertaking that upon release on bail the revisionist will not be permitted to go into contact or association with any known criminal or allowed to be exposed to any moral, physical, or psychological danger and further that the father will ensure that the juvenile will not repeat the offence.

¶15

(ii) The revisionist/ father will further furnish an undertaking to the effect that the juvenile will pursue his study at the appropriate level which he would be encouraged to do besides other constructive activities and not be allowed to waste his time in unproductive and excessive recreational pursuits.

¶16

(iii) Juvenile and the revisionist/ father will report to the Probation Officer on the first Monday of every calendar month.

¶17

(iv) The Probation Officer will keep a strict vigil on the activities of the juvenile and regularly draw up his social investigation report that would be submitted to the Juvenile Justice Board concerned on such a periodical basis as the Juvenile Justice Board may determine.

¶18

Order Date :- 6.12.2023 Suraj Srivastav

¶19

Digitally signed by :- SURAJ SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Juvenile -X v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Juvenile -X v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Mukesh Sharma and 4 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Sri Mukesh Sharma and 4 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Brijesh Sharma vs State of U.P. and Another

X (Minor) Vs State of U.P. and Another

Mrs. Sheela Devi Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Chandan Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another