Suhel and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the petitioner's application to quash an F.I.R. under the Essential Commodities Act, holding that it prima facie discloses a cognizable offence. The court, however, directed compliance if Section 41-A CrPC applies.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition to quash the F.I.R. was dismissed; the State was directed to ensure compliance with Section 41-A CrPC if applicable.