A criminal writ petition was dismissed by the High Court due to the petitioner's absence and the consequent want of prosecution. The petition sought to quash an FIR and direct non-arrest under various criminal statutes.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:104704-DB
Court No. - 45
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20426 of 2022
Petitioner :- Tasleem And 6 Others Respondent :- State Of U P And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nitin Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Sushil
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J. Hon'ble Surendra Singh-I,J.
"(A) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the first information report dated 14.11.2022 which is registered as Case Crime No.0380/2022, under Section 498-A IPC and Section 3/4 D.P.Act1961 and 3/4 M.W. (P.R.M) Act, 2019, Police Station-Bhojpur, District Moradabad (Annexure No.1) to this writ petition).
(B) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents no.2 and 3 not to arrest the Petitioner in Case Crime No.0380/2022, under Section 498-A IPC and Section 3/4 D.P.Act-1961 and 3/4 M.W. (P.R.M) Act, 2019, Police Station- Bhojpur, District Moradabad."
Order Date :- 12.5.2023 Nitendra
Digitally signed by :- NITENDRA TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Tasleem And 6 Others
State Of U P And 3 Others
Vivek Kumar Birla
Surendra Singh-I
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
