Disposed

Taiyab v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC13 Feb 2023CRLP/19507/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of a criminal writ petition seeking to quash orders and direct the Commissioner Moradabad to decide a pending appeal and stay application within one week and restrain the Respondent No. 3 from implementing a specific order during the pendency of the appeal.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of directing Commissioner Moradabad to decide the appeal and stay application within one week and directing Respondent No.3 not to implement the order dated 31.08.2022 during pe

Taiyab Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Court No. - 91 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 19507 of 2022 Petitioner :- Taiyab Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Brijesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

¶2

Hon'ble Mohd. Azhar Husain Idrisi,J.

¶3

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶4

The petitioner has filed the present criminal writ petition seeking following relief:-

¶5

"1. Issue a writ or writs, order or orders, direction or directions in the nature of certiorari to quash the impugned order dated 09.09.2022 passed by Commissioner Moradabad (respondent no. 2) as well as the order dated 31.08.2022 passed by Additional District Magistrate (Judicial) (respondent no.3).

¶6

2. Issue a writ or writs order or orders, direction or directions in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Respondent No. 2 to decide the stay application which is pending along with the appeal and further direct to the respondent no. 3 not to made any implementation on order dated 31.08.2022 passed by respondent no. 3, during pendency of the appeal pending before the Commissioner, Moradabad Division, Moradabad."

¶7

Leaned counsel for the petitioner has confined his submission with regard to disposal of the stay application, which is stated to be pending alongwith appeal before respondent No. 2- Commissioner, Moradabad Division, Moradabad, within stipulated time.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has no objection for expeditious disposal of the stay application pending alongwith appeal.

¶9

In view of the categorical submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is finally disposed of with the direction to respondent No. 2- Commissioner, Moradabad Division, Moradabad, to decide the Stay application, in case same has already been filed, alongwith appeal, which is stated to be pending being Appeal No. 1567 of 2022 (Taiyab Vs. State of U.P.) within one week from today, subject to any legal impediment and co-operation of the parties.

¶10

Order Date :- 13.2.2023 Rmk.

¶11

Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Taiyab v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Taiyab v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bijuli Singh Vs State of U.P. and 17 Others

Chandra Prakash Vs State of U.P.

Smt. Richa Vs State of U.P. and Another

Gulam Rasool Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Abrar Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Ghurahu and 6 Others Vs State of U.P.