This court rejected the petitioner's merged defence submitted during the hearing of a writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR. The court held that submissions amounting to defence cannot be entertained to quash an FIR and dismissed the petition.
The prayer to quash the First Information Report is rejected and the writ petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:215037-DB
Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 17495 of 2023
Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjeev Kumar Pandey,Dinesh Singh Yadav
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Order Date :- 8.11.2023 Mayank
Digitally signed by :- HIMANSHU YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the prayer to quash the FIR falls for consideration under Article 226 while the allegations disclose commission of cognizable offences?
Sunil Kumar
State Of U.P.
Anjani Kumar Mishra
Vivek Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
