The High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR. The court held that the petitioners' argument regarding a cross-FIR was a defence matter unsuitable for review in a writ petition, and the allegations constituted cognizable offences.
The writ petition seeking quashing of the FIR is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:214777-DB
Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 17480 of 2023
Petitioner :- Rajendra Pal And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinay Kumar Pal Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Order Date :- 8.11.2023
SY
Digitally signed by :- SUSHAMA YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR can successfully argue that it is a cross-FIR lodged by an accused.
Whether allegations in an FIR showing cognizable offences make the petition for quashaling misconceived.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajendra Pal And 4 Others
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Anjani Kumar Mishra
Vivek Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
