Smt. Neetu Yadav sought fair investigation in a criminal case via a criminal miscellaneous writ petition. The Allahabad High Court was informed that the final report had already been submitted, rendering the petition infructuous, resulting in its instant dismissal.
None granted; petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:225810-DB
Court No. - 45
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 17427 of 2023
Petitioner :- Smt. Neetu Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhishek Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J. Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
Order Date :- 30.11.2023 Lalit Shukla
Digitally signed by :- LALIT KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking fair investigation is maintainable when the final report has already been submitted.
Neetu Yadav
State Of U.P.
Vivek Kumar Birla
Vinod Diwakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
