Disposed

Jyoti Prakash Singh and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC29 Nov 2023CRLP/17126/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of the criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the quashing of an FIR and direction not to arrest. The court held that apex court guidelines regarding arrest mandates must apply to the facts of the instant case.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of in terms of the guidelines upheld in Arnesh Kumar and co-ordinate judgments.

Jyoti Prakash Singh and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and 2… — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:225706-DB

¶2

Court No. - 45

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 17126 of 2023

¶4

Petitioner :- Jyoti Prakash Singh And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Indra Deo Mishra,Manoj Kumar Mishra,Pankaj Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J. Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.

¶6

Heard Shri Indra Deo Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri G.P. Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State respondents.

¶7

The present writ petition has been preferred with the prayer to quash the impugned First Information Report dated 30.09.2023, registered as Case Crime No. 388 of 2023, under Sections 354, 506 IPC, P.S. Koraon, District Allahabad and for a direction to the respondents not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of impugned First Information Report.

¶8

Although prayer for quashing of FIR has been made but without insisting on the same only submission is that all alleged offences are punishable with imprisonment upto seven years, therefore the police authorities are bound to follow the procedure laid down under Section 41-A Cr.P.C. The petitioners have been wrongly implicated and could not be arrested. Reliance has been placed on the judgement of Apex Court in Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar, (2014) 8 SCC 273 and Social Action Forum for Manav Adhikar Vs. Union of India, Ministry of Law and Justice and others in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 73 of 2015 with Criminal Appeal No. 1265 of 2017, Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 156 of

¶9

2017, Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another, (2022) 10 SCC 51 and co-ordinate Division Bench of this Court in Vimal Kumar & 3 others Vs. State of U.P. & 3 others in 2021 (2) ACR 1147.

¶10

4.We have gone through the impugned first information report and without interfering in the same, we are of the opinion that the guidelines framed by the Apex Court in the above noted judgement are equally applicable to the facts of the instant case.

¶11

Accordingly, the instant petition also stands disposed of in terms of the judgements as noted above.

¶12

Order Date :- 29.11.2023 Ujjawal

¶13

Digitally signed by :- UJJAWAL PARJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Jyoti Prakash Singh and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jyoti Prakash Singh and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajay Puri and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Shashikala Chaudhary Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Smt. Suman Mishra Vs State of U.P. and 10 Others

Lav Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Shoaib @ Mohd. Shoaib and Another Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Ravi and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others