The High Court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR. It held that defence submissions cannot be considered in such writs and the allegations clearly disclosed serious cognizable offences.
The writ petition seeking quashing of the FIR dated 17.04.2023 was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:212397-DB
Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 17317 of 2023
Petitioner :- Naushad Kureshi And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Chandra Solanki Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Order Date :- 6.11.2023 SY
Digitally signed by :- SUSHAMA YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a writ petition should allow the petitioners to argue their defence while seeking quashing of an FIR.
Whether the allegations in the FIR disclose commission of cognizable offences serious enough to reject the quashing prayer.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Naushad Kureshi And 2 Others
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Anjani Kumar Mishra
Vivek Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
