The petitioner sought directions to supervise a police investigation. The court dismissed the petition as the petitioner had already availed the statutory remedy under section 156(3) Cr.P.C. and a categorical direction for fair investigation had already been issued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:224529-DB
Court No. - 45
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 17971 of 2023
Petitioner :- Smt. Suman Mishra Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anand Pati Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J. Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
petitioner is still with any grievance, he may approach the court concerned under section 156(3) Cr.P.C.
Order Date :- 28.11.2023 Anil K. Sharma
Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a criminal miscellaneous writ petition should be entertained when the petitioner has already availed the statutory remedy under section 156(3) Cr.P.C. seeking proper investigation?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Suman Mishra
State Of U.P.
Vivek Kumar Birla
Vinod Diwakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
