Santosh @ Pappu v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
No. - 2023:AHC:200429-DB Court No. - 67 Case…
No. - 2023:AHC:200429-DB Court No. - 67 Case…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:200429-DB
Court No. - 67
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16311 of 2023
Petitioner :- Santosh @ Pappu Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rang Nath Pandey,Rahul Pandey
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J. Hon'ble Mohd. Azhar Husain Idrisi,J.
the issue and with regard to his alleged apprehension regarding his attachment of property, if such an application is moved the Superintendent of Police Firozabad would apply his judicial mind and decide the same by a reasoned order within a period of 10 days from its institution.
Order Date :- 16.10.2023 Vikram
Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Santosh @ Pappu
State Of U.P.
Rahul Chaturvedi
Mohd. Azhar Husain Idrisi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court