This is a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR. The High Court dismissed the petition because the petitioner was not named in the FIR, thereby lacking locus standi to challenge it.
The writ petition was dismissed without prejudice to the right to apply for bail or anticipatory bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:190694-DB
Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 15573 of 2023
Petitioner :- Muklesh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- R.K. Singh. Rajput Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Order Date :- 4.10.2023 Mayank
Digitally signed by :- MAYANK KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner can file a writ petition to quash an FIR in which he is not named.
Muklesh
State Of U.P.
Anjani Kumar Mishra
Vivek Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
