The Allahabad High Court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR under various IPC sections. The court rejected the plea noting the petitioner did not claim title over the land and held that the FIR allegations clearly disclosed a cognizable offence.
The prayer for quashing of the FIR was rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:190820-DB
Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 15459 of 2023
Petitioner :- Denzil D Wilson And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhishek Kumar Yadav,Prem Singh,Uns Ahmad Siddiqui
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Order Date :- 4.10.2023 Mayank
Digitally signed by :- MAYANK KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the First Information Report should be quashed given the petitioner lacks title to the land in question.
Whether the allegations in the FIR disclose the commission of a cognizable offence warranting dismissal of the quashing petition.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Denzil D Wilson And Another
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
Anjani Kumar Mishra
Vivek Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
