This was a criminal miscellaneous writ petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner abandoned the petition. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed without liberty to file a fresh petition for the same cause of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:167047-DB
Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 12990 of 2023
Petitioner :- Rinki Devi And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Alok Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Dhirendra Kumar Verma,Srawan Kumar Swarnkar
Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms. Jushi Srivastava, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press this petition and it may be dismissed as not pressed.
Under the circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
It is made clear that no liberty is granted to the petitioners to file fresh petition for the same cause of action.
Order Date :- 18.8.2023 Dev/-
Digitally signed by :- DEV PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Rinki Devi and Another
State Of U.P.
Anjani Kumar Mishra
Vivek Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
