Petitioner withdrew the criminal miscellaneous writ petition. The High Court dismissed the petition as not pressed and prohibited filing of a fresh petition on the same cause of action.
Writ petition dismissed as not pressed; liberty to file fresh petition denied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:166093-DB
Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11950 of 2023
Petitioner :- Gaurav Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Lok Nath Shukla
Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Shri Ram Chandra Uttam, Advocate holding brief of Shri Anil Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the instant writ petition and the same may be dismissed as not pressed.
The petition is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed.
It is made clear that no liberty shall be granted to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition on the same cause of action.
Order Date :- 17.8.2023 Bhanu
Digitally signed by :- BHANU PRATAP KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Gaurav Srivastava
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Anjani Kumar Mishra
Vivek Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
