In this criminal appeal where the appellant declined to press the matter, the High Court dismissed the appeal as not pressed with liberty to approach the competent court, noting the bench had not passed the impugned order exclusively.
Liberty to file appropriate application/proceedings before the court of competent jurisdiction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:223275
Court No. - 83
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 725 of 2023
Appellant :- Gopal @ Tushar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Chitranshu Srivastav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Babita Upadhyay
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Shri Chitranshu Srivastava, learned counsel for the appellant, Smt. Babita Upadhyay, learned counsel for opposite party no. 3 and Shri Karunakar Singh, learned A.G.A for the State are present.
Learned counsel for the appellant does not want to press the present criminal appeal.
The impugned order has not been passed exclusively by Special Judge SC/ST Act.
In view of the above facts and circumstances, the present criminal appeal is dismissed as not pressed with a liberty to file appropriate application/proceedings before the court of competent jurisdiction.
Office is directed to return the certified copies to the learned counsel for the applicant, after taking the copies of the same.
Order Date :- 2.11.2023 Saurabh
Digitally signed by :- SAURABH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Gopal @ Tushar
State Of U.P.
Others
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
