Shamshul v. State of U.P. and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The appeal before the bench was dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the appellant despite peremptory listing.
What did the court decide?
Criminal Appeal No. - 7729 of 2019 dismissed for want of prosecution.
What the court decided
Court No. - 80
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 7729 of 2019
Appellant :- Shamshul Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Anr. Counsel for Appellant :- Syed Ahmed Faizan,Syed Mohd Taqi Abdi
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,V.P. Singh Kashyap
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
List has been revised.
This case is listed peremptorily today.
No one responds on behalf of the appellant, like earlier dates fixed.
It is not known whether the trial has been concluded or not. Whether the appellant has charge-sheeted or exonerated.
This criminal appeal, is accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 3.5.2023 Ruchi Agrahari
Digitally signed by :- RUCHI AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Shamshul
- respondent
State Of U.P. And Anr.
Coram
Siddharth
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/7729/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court