The appellant abandoned prayers to set aside cognizance in a SC/ST Act case. The court agreed to consider bail upon surrender within three weeks and directed no coercive action during that period before finally disposing the appeal.
No coercive action to be taken if appellants surrender within three weeks; bail to be considered thereafter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:128716
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 5983 of 2023
Appellant :- Mahesh And Another Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Appellant :- Sandeep Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Satendra Kumar Upadhyay
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
1. Case called out.
Order Date :- 26.6.2023 M. ARIF
(Samit Gopal, J.)
Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow the appeal seeking set aside of cognizance and stay of proceedings in a case under the SC/ST Act.
Whether bail should be considered for appellants upon surrender with reference to Apex Court law.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherReferred¶10
(2021) 10 SCC 773 · Who else cites this
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Mahesh
Harsh
State of U.P.
Samit Gopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
