sheet was filed by the police. It is further submitted that there is no illegality in the cognizance order and also in the order summoning the appellants to face the trial. It is also submitted that after issuance of summons and bailable warrants, non-bailable warrants were issued against the appellants. It is also submitted that injured Sapna Devi, daughter of the informant has made categorical statement that they were abused by their caste by the accused persons at the time of incident. It is also submitted that three injured persons sustained injuries in the incident caused by the appellants and they have been medically examined. It is further submitted that all the witnesses of fact as well as the injured have supported the prosecution case. It is further submitted that there is no ground for quashing the charge sheet or summoning order or the order for issuance of non-bailable warrants against the appellants. It is further stated that in the case of Rajeev Kourav Vs. Baisahab (2020)3 SCC 317 the Hon'ble Apex Court has held that the High Court cannot embark upon the appreciation of evidence while considering the petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing criminal proceedings. If a prima facie case is made out disclosing the ingredients of the offence alleged against the accused, the Court cannot quash a criminal proceeding.