Karimuddin v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
This court disposed of a criminal appeal under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. The appeal abated because the office report confirmed the appellant died before the hearing.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:119882
Court No. - 71
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3626 of 2004
Appellant :- Karimuddin Respondent :- State of U.P. Counsel for Appellant :- Dinesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
- Matter taken up in the revised list. No one appears on behalf of the appellant to press this appeal. Sri Rajiv Dhar Dwivedi, learned counsel for the State is present.
- The present appeal under Section 374 (2) Cr.P.C has been preferred by the appellant against the judgment and order dated 16.7.2004.
- As per the office report dated 26.4.2023, a report of C.J.M., concerned dated 22.8.2022 has been received stating therein that the sole appellant Karimuddin has died on 25.11.2015. The said report has been sent after due inquiry.
- This Court has perused the said report which states that the accused-appellant Karimuddin has died on 25.11.2015.
- In view of the above, the appeal stands abated.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Karimuddin
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Samit Gopal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/3626/2004
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court